Monday, May 28, 2018

Terrain Analysis matters ! - Correlation to Contest Scores

Couple of years ago my neighbourhood started changing rapidly. Once used to be a 5 Acre coconut grove just 100 Feet north of my QTH was grounded over a week's time. It is the demolition monster drive similar to the one in Avataar movie. Along with hundreds of eagles and birds who lost their home that day, I had lost hope on my peak DXing days! After hearing that it was mega project with 360 apartments spread over 5 blocks of 18 floors each, my spinal felt like just out of frozen ice :(.

One of my senior ham friend did help me morally a bit providing what was unknown to me then called HFTA. That analysis stated that, I will loose my sight in the direction of this building which is 320 deg to around 30 Deg north. And it happens to be prime area for contesting and DXing over the poles!.

Recently I purchased ARRL's Antenna handbook. The CD which came with it contained HFTA software written by N6BV. I got hooked to it once I learnt how to use it. It opened up new paradigm for me on HF ray propagation and study the effect of stacking, antenna height with respect to immediate terrain. In combination with K6TU.net 's excellent terrain data service. I started doing many hours analysis of locations I had been recently as well.

CQWPX CW 2018 was the first contest after the high rise got completed. This contest was to test my understanding and vola... It really did reflect what was predicted. Signals were way down than it used to be. Partially overall HF weather also had a play I am sure.

Following are the graphs of these changed conditions. My terrace is at 140 ft level and around 150 ft from me is 180 ft tall building.


I plotted the graph with antenna at popular 50ft level on flat reference ground(Green), 150Ft level without the highrise (Blue) at 330 deg and current condition with Highrise (Red). Purple bars show %ge times signal arrival based on statistics.

We can see at 150ft level, there were deep nulls with signals below reference level. But then, there was surge in gain at low angles. No wonder why I used to catch K3LR  and other long haul DX before many could hear them. But see what happened to me now. Red line barely rises above reference and gain is no where near compared to peak gain of 16dbi at 7 Deg I had earlier (down by 15 dBi now i.e 2.5 SUnits or more). Less of make and lot of break moments.  We can also see that between 3Deg and 13 Deg there is statistical average of 5% or more signal arriving. All these chances are lean now.

Following is similar graph for 15Mtr band.


And this reflected in my score. I used to have restricted grade earlier and best score was in 2015 CQWW CW with nearly a million points. I could achieve this with 2 element Hex and 50Watts only.  End of 2017 in the same contest I could only manage 600K points, that too with 400 Watts and Spiderbeam. i.e. effectively 9dB (due to Amp) + 1.5 dBi (avg spiderbeam increase) = 10.5 dBi gain.
This gain in forward direction was negated by the high rise on transmit. On receive it is only 1.5 dBi, which will be of no use as building is blocking most of the low incoming signals. In total effect, i may be sounding similar to my restricted grade signal to DX, but if they respond and signal rays arrive at those angles, I will never hear them :(.

Lastly, 150 Feet height  was not the best in both the cases either. One can see deep nulls at some elevation angles with good %ge of signal arrivals. Most of the contesters have mono bander stacks just to overcome those deep nulls. Following is stack of two number of 3 element yagis at 90 and 120 feet.  See how it moves the nulls to right making space for desired angles.



Today, I feel I know many of these wonderful areas of propagation due to software such as HFTA, but handicapped to try the improvements. I am hoping that in the future, I can go to right places and put portable stations for contests!

Cheers
VU2XE Kiran


Disclaimer: As usual, this blog and its content is only based on my own personal experiments and observations. I share it for fun and in hope to kinder some curiosity. I am no expert in these areas. Sometimes, my conclusions may not be accurate. For accurate information you are suggested to look out for original sources and experts in these areas.



Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Multibander antenna and harmonic radiation thoughts

Desclaimer: Articles here are purely based my personal experiments and observations. Though i read lot of articles and books on my favorite subject of Antennas and Propagation, i am no expert in this field. If you are here looking for such accurate information, this blog may not be for you. Otherwise, hope you will enjoy reading these posts and probably try some techniques yourself!

I have been using HF multibander for many years now. My first multibander 40-10m antenna at Mumbai QTH involved simple inverted Vee with single feeder at around 20ft above the apartment terrace. It worked very well giving hours of fun on the band.

I started using tuned magnetic loop for QRP digital modes when I traveled within US. It was simply amazing experience using loops.

When I moved to Bangalore in 2011, my first comeback antenna was Hex beam. It is awesomely portable, and gave value for every bit i spent. It was my sole antenna for couple of years with some experimental wire delta loops, dipole and verticals on the side. Currently, I have Spiderbeam antenna which is another dB upgrade to my station for sure!.

All these times i was not much having thoughts around monoband antennas other than my 40mtr vertical. I had not even considered putting up any serious yagis due to apartment living. Reading a lot about other contest stations around the world, i was wondering why they normally have mono bander stacks. One obvious reason is for stacking antennas with optimal height distances and pattern uniformity. Second reason, i am sure these multi stations aim is for reducing harmonic  radiation.

This second aspect, never caught my attention till now. Here is what happens to typical station transmitting with solid state amplifier. Suppose amplifier's LPF section is not working, and fundamental on 40mtr is around 400Watts, second harmonic is 40dB down and third is only 10dB down. Refer https://www.w6pql.com/a_1.5kw_lpf_for_160-6m.htm
15mtr band will see 40W signal for 400W. Without LPF between amp and multiband antenna 40 to 10mtr fan dipole for example, will transmit both 400W fundamental signal and also 40W harmonic signal will be transmitted on the air. This power is more than sufficient to cause QRM. It just sucks!.

Currently my amplifier has LPF board which suppresses the harmonics to greater than -50 dB. That is to teen milliwatt level which brings signals into safe zone. Now going back to multiband antenna again assuming that there was no harmonic suppression, with yagi of 10dB gain, 40W harmonic would sound like 400W signal simulcasting on harmonic band. With resonant monobander this problem is eliminated. In reverse direction it is true for receiving as well, resonant monobander acts like pre selector eliminating any front end related issues and IMD. Whereas, multi bander keeps gate open for all signals resonant on those bands.

This topic started to make me think some field antennas tried in the past by me such as fan verticals and fan inverted Vee, may not be right choice during the contests or in multi station activation.
A point to ponder further and probably test sometime!

Cheers
Kiran VU2XE



Convenience or Compromise antenna for portable HF?!

 It depends on what one considers as good ops!. When speed matters like in regional emergency comms, NVIS strategy is most beneficial. NVIS ...